Quality Test – Any better than Untouched?
Posted by admin | Posted in Laptop Computers | Posted on 11-04-2010-05-2008
0
| I can't seem to get sexy Youtube videos that are nice in HQ and without artifacts in HD. I actually think HD is uglier than HQ just because HQ doesn't give as many artifacts on the screen around the killfeed. Suggestions people? (Bitrate recording = 13.5)(Render Settings = Best 16:9 HD WMV)(Effects - Sharpen 0.1, Levels 0.1, Crop 92%, Saturation 2.0) The codec is Windows Media Video 9 but is there any AVI HD codecs that produce no artifacts but retain deep blacks and contrast? Thinking about it, could it be the codec thats PLAYING my videos in youtube? ;) I have ffdshow, DIVX & CCCP installed :) Anyone know whats the best one? (I was at my missus and one of Patchys HQ vids were like superhd on her laptop. I asked him for settings, these are them but I cant get the same quality nor find the one of his I liked so much) Just while I'm at it, a few shout outs. www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com ...and a belated happy birthday to viirus' dad on Wednesday, he turned 40! :) (Oh cock, apologies to www.limexb360.co.uk, sorry I forgot the sponsor message but this took nearly 3 hours to render, upload and process so I'm gonna leave it off this one now, sorry ) Everyone go pre-order your TB-X41s from Lime before MW2 gets here :) |
Duration: 00:02:46 Rating: ![]() ![]() ![]() View: 4,697From: geekrichieuk Keywords: |
Related Video












